Global Issues

Where YOU Should Hide if WW3 Starts

Lt34ED@xs July 13, 2024

Where YOU Should Hide if WW3 Starts

By The Military Show

If World War III breaks out, where should you seek refuge? Avoid the Baltic Sea, Eastern Europe, and hotspots in Asia. Missiles could fly across continents in minutes! Fiji, Tuvalu, and New Zealand are safer bets, with their remote locations and limited strategic importance. In the Northern Hemisphere, consider Iceland or Greenland for isolation, while in South America, Chile offers protection in the Andes. Stay safe and make informed choices.

Here’s what others had to say:

@arandomguy6114
What i really want to know, is why the hell after TWO world wars, are there still people pushing for a third!? Can’t these politicians just stop being so childish?

@creeib
The fact that we are having this discussion is truly horrific.

@arandomguy6114
What i really want to know, is why the hell after TWO world wars, are there still people pushing for a third!? Can’t these politicians just stop being so childish?

@creeib
The fact that we are having this discussion is truly horrific.

@ltfreeborn
Absolutely nowhere, i dont wanna be alive when the nuclear winter starts.

@annea3004
I’ve watched people dying from cancers… there are those who’ve destroyed themselves with drugs and alcohol. Let’s not forget those who’ve been confined to a nursing home.
War is frightening because we may suffer and die. However, life is generally unpredictable and loved ones may die suddenly. Seems there are no winners on Earth. Best thing to do is love with all your heart and follow your favourite spiritual practice. We are eternal. Our loved ones are also eternal beings. Enjoy every day as much as possible.

@cyberspooky
In a word, Tasmania, no nuclear fallout will fall on Tasmania, good fishing, lots of food and grain grown locally, clean air and water fed from the Antarctic, all power is green and not reliant on the mainland, already there safe and sound.

@DeadeyeJim327
If WW3 breaks out, I ain’t doing sh!t but kissing my own ass goodbye. I’ll try to keep alive where I am, but I’m here to rebuild, not run.

@robertandrew880
I’m all good wirh not surviving WW3. Especially if nukes are used, would you really want to survive that? Face no power grids, lack of medicine, food and potable water? Think I’d be good with heading home and seeing all of my dogs that I’ve outlived.

@stevanrose7439
Where are you going to run to if the pull the nuclear trigger. Going to a different city or state is like changing chairs on the titanic. It’s all still going down. We need someone in power that thinks more about peace than war.

@little-wytch
A safer option would be to be as mobile as possible. I personally would like to be on a sailboat with plenty of solar panels, a marine wind turbine, and an electric backup motor that can act as a generator when under sail, as well as a water maker and plenty of fishing gear and vitamin C pills lol. With that sort of setup, you could stay on the move, hide out far at sea, maybe island hop and transport people or mail between islands in exchange for a bit of food that you can’t catch at sea. I’d also have a large container of different seeds to plant various crops on unpopulated islands I might come across as backup caches of planted food.

@crazyt1ger08
“Some dangers in South Africa”, well that would have to be the understatement of the year.

@JosephSolisAlcaydeAlberici
Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Paraguay, and Uruguay will be the safest countries in the world and will inherit the world under a post-nuclear holocaust world.

@hazardousmaterials1284
Yay! At the start of the video, I thought Chile. It’s isolated by the Andes and the Pacific, but is still on a continent. If the war interrupts global trade, those islands you mentioned first could become a prison, trapping you and any refuges there, with little options for escape. I’m sticking with my decision!

@Aurleis
The safest place to be to avoid nuclear strike is hands down going to be North Sentinel Island. The problem comes in when you meet its inhabitants and you realize that you probably should’ve just taken your chances and stayed home.

@richardkammerer2814
Back in Buffalo, my 9th grade home room teacher in 1964 said he moved to East Aurora due to the favorable prevailing winds per the hydroelectric power complex weighed against the distance from the school. Today, I’d opt for a squat on the roof with a batch of Martinis.

@Jinisinsane
Those nameless islands in the pacific might work, you only need a sailboat and enough supplies and repair materials. Pirates might be a problem tho.

@ancabostinariu6550
New Zeeland, Tuvalu, Fi ji, Iceland, Groenlanda, Azores and Texeira Island, South Am Brazil , Chile, South Africa,

@ytzpilot
So my strategy is to just stay in New Zealand, I wouldn’t have to eat sheep I would just eat seafood, this video didn’t mention Seafood is in much higher abundance than sheep.

@Golden_Rule_Truth
Birthplace of mankind near the Great Rift Valley inAfrica (Uganda, South Sudan).
It’s one of the few places that won’t be hit by nukes and can stay warm even a nuclear winter that last decades potentially…
– it’s also where the Nile River begins. Very fertile area once the world is “reset”

@JanRademan
Long term quality of life on the pacific islands will however be an issue. Much of their modern lifestyle is dependent on imports such as petroleum. While they might avoid direct attack, they would regress very quickly with the collapse in trade with the outside world. The (relatively) high populations they can sustain now will be reduced dramatically. Some islands could become completely uninhabitable if cut off from the rest of the world.

@Nylon_riot
The geothermal plant on Iceland has been constantly under threat from volcanic efuptions. And there is concern that the other volcanoes might wake up.

Absolutely nowhere, i dont wanna be alive when the nuclear winter starts.