Elon Musks Goal to Get to Mars and Build a Mars Base Capable of Supporting Human Life, as Grand as it is, is based on the Assumption that NASA didn’t lie about Mankind Landing on the Moon, and Returning Safely to Earth

Twitter Post By Jamie McIntyre

Elon Musks goal to get to Mars and build a mars base capable of supporting human life, as grand as it is, is based on the assumption that NASA didn’t lie about mankind landing on the moon, and returning safely to earth.
Assumptions such as that carry risks, especially with NASA’s track record.

Yet what are the probabilities of other worlds that could be found and reached in our lifetime, before any Mars mission could be achieved?

Such as other worlds under the ocean or through the supposed ice shelf the flat earth theory suggests.

Would not missions to prove such a theory is a theory, be worthwhile, especially considering it isn’t a theory that the Nazis had Antartica bases, fled to them during the end of WW2, and the US sent a military mission to pursue them and engage to Antartica in 1946, headed up by Admiral Bryd.

If they thought it was valid to pursue such a mission and so much is kept secret about Antarctica, and the banning of flights over most of it, then isn’t it a more realistic mission to discover why the Nazis had bases in the Antarctic underground and why the US thought it real enough to pursue them there?
And what of Admiral Bryd’s diary and the green lands he claimed to see past the ice shelf’s in Antartica?

Is it less believable than somehow landing on the moon with 1969 tech?

I’m not a betting person, but I would back a mission to find other worlds on this planet , before man ever reaches Mars and sustains a mars base.

If I was Musk I would have an insurance policy by pursuing both, to see which one succeeds first, if the goal is to sustain human life outside our existing known world.
We haven’t even explored a fraction of the ocean let alone under the earths surface.

Thoughts?